Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Cannabis Industry in Crisis According to New Research

Cannabis Industry in Crisis According to New Research
Cannabis Industry in Crisis According to New Research

Whitney Economics, a prominent cannabis economics data, consulting, and research firm, has recently released its second annual Cannabis Operator Sentiment and Business Conditions survey report. The report, based on an extensive survey of U.S. cannabis business licensees, examines the perspectives of industry operators on their success and the barriers they face.

The survey assessed shortages and surpluses in materials, services, and labor inputs in relation to future expectations. It also revealed key business metrics such as revenues, profits, margins, and costs.


The survey aims to bridge the gap between the theoretical concepts of business economics and the daily realities faced by operators within the cannabis industry, as stated by Beau Whitney, the founder of Whitney Economics.

The report's findings are eye-opening and provide valuable insights into the state of the U.S. cannabis industry. The most significant finding is that less than a quarter, specifically 24.4%, of cannabis operators in the United States reported being profitable. This represents a considerable decline from the previous year when 42% of operators reported profitability.

Unfortunately, the survey indicates that relief may not be on the horizon for operators in the near future. Whitney Economics forecasts a challenging period of seven quarters with slower-than-normal growth for the cannabis industry.

Rising costs and falling prices have put tremendous pressure on retailers and operators, forcing them to find ways to do more with less. Moreover, the lack of access to normal business protections further exacerbates the risks faced by cannabis businesses. Operators have been forced to pivot multiple times in response to changing market conditions, but many factors beyond their control continue to hinder their success.

The success of cannabis businesses is heavily influenced by the regulatory structure of the states in which they operate. Additionally, other external factors play a crucial role. While markets and business conditions have evolved, regulatory policies have remained stagnant. This misalignment has negatively impacted cannabis operators, who are navigating an environment focused more on tax generation than on fostering a business-friendly atmosphere.

Surprisingly, over 70% of the survey respondents expressed support for a limited cannabis licensure structure, even though many of them came from states with unlimited licenses. This finding underscores the fact that regulatory policies have not kept pace with the evolving market conditions, creating an imbalance that hampers the potential of cannabis businesses, as well as the need for regulatory policies that align with industry needs and create a more supportive business environment. 

While regulations are necessary to ensure consumer safety and product quality, overly strict rules and high compliance costs can stifle business growth and innovation. However, it is essential to strike the right balance between limiting licenses and ensuring opportunities for new entrants and small businesses to thrive.

With less than a quarter of operators reporting profitability and ongoing obstacles such as taxes, strict regulations, and limited access to capital, the industry requires regulatory reforms and a more industry-focused approach to foster growth and improve operator sentiment. By addressing these issues and creating a business-friendly environment, the cannabis industry has the potential to overcome these obstacles and thrive in the coming years.

The cannabis industry has come a long way since its legalization in various states across the United States. However, as the survey report from Whitney Economics highlights, profitability remains a significant challenge for the majority of cannabis businesses. This raises concerns about the long-term sustainability and viability of the industry as a whole.

Additionally, the lack of access to capital further exacerbates the difficulties faced by operators. Traditional financial institutions, such as banks, are often reluctant to provide services to cannabis businesses due to conflicting federal and state laws. This forces operators to rely on alternative financing options with higher interest rates and more stringent or predatory terms, further eating into their already limited profit margins.

Moreover, taxes imposed on cannabis businesses pose another significant burden. While taxation is a necessary component of any regulated industry, excessive tax rates can strain the finances of operators, particularly when coupled with the other challenges they face. Finding the right balance between generating tax revenue and supporting the growth of cannabis businesses is crucial to fostering a thriving industry.

Despite these obstacles, the survey reveals an intriguing finding: the majority of respondents, including those from states with unlimited licenses, support some form of limited cannabis licensure structure. This indicates that operators recognize the need for a more controlled market, which can potentially lead to reduced competition and more stable business conditions. 

To address the issues outlined in the survey report and promote a more favorable business environment, policymakers need to prioritize the needs of cannabis businesses. This includes reviewing and updating regulatory policies to align with industry demands, streamlining licensing processes, and providing more accessible avenues for capital investment. Furthermore, collaboration between industry stakeholders, policymakers, and regulators is crucial to finding sustainable solutions that balance the interests of all parties involved.

The complete report, providing comprehensive insights into the survey findings, can be downloaded from the Whitney Economics website at https://whitneyeconomics.com/reports

Disclaimer: This article is based on the information provided by Whitney Economics and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct further research and seek professional advice before making any business or investment decisions.

More For You

Comprehensive Glossary of Cannabis Terminology - The Bluntness
Cannabis Terminology - The Bluntness
Photo by Margo Amala on Unsplash

Cannabis Glossary: 120+ Terms

Cannabis terminology can be overwhelming for new consumers. This glossary defines 120+ essential terms including cannabinoids (THC, CBD), consumption methods (vaping, edibles), and industry concepts to help you navigate dispensaries and products confidently.

Why Cannabis Terminology Matters

Cannabis terminology can feel overwhelming when you first step into a dispensary or browse online menus. Understanding the language helps you:

  • Communicate effectively with budtenders and medical professionals
  • Make informed decisions about products and consumption methods
  • Navigate dispensary menus with confidence
  • Understand product labels and lab results
  • Find products that match your needs and preferences
  • Stay safe by recognizing quality indicators and potential issues

This glossary provides clear, accurate definitions for over 120 cannabis terms, from basic concepts to advanced cultivation and processing terminology. Whether you're a first-time consumer or an experienced enthusiast, this guide will enhance your cannabis knowledge.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are you paying too much attention to THC percentage? - The Bluntness

Are you paying too much attention to THC percentage? - The Bluntness

High-THC: Is % Important?

If this comes as a surprise, you’re not alone. The value of a simple number on a label receives too much credit from consumers and budtenders alike. It seems no matter how many times we think we understand cannabis, science manages to throw us off - in a good way, of course.

The question of whether percentage matter is often debated, as THC percentage alone is not a reliable indicator of overall quality or experience. Like it or not, the way cannabis interacts with the mind and body makes a simple THC measurement inaccurate to tell how high you’ll get. Potency - like many things about cannabis - is complicated.

Keep ReadingShow less
gif of actor Kevin James from King of Queens; asking "How Much Does That Cost?"
Why Is Some Weed More Expensive Than Others? Understanding Cannabis Pricing
Giphy

Unraveling Cannabis Pricing: Factors Behind the Cost of Weed


Step inside a cannabis dispensary for the first time and the experience can be overwhelming. The meticulously labeled glass jars showcase dozens of strains with names like "Wedding Cake" and "Blue Dream," while refrigerated cases display concentrates, edibles, and tinctures at wildly different price points. Unlike the days when consumers were limited to whatever their neighborhood dealer offered, today's legal market presents a dazzling array of options that might leave newcomers with both wonder and sticker shock.

Keep ReadingShow less
Socrates contemplates the Greek government's confusion over medical cannabis.
Socrates contemplates the Greek government's confusion over medical cannabis.

Medical Cannabis in Greece? The Greek Government Has No Idea What It’s Doing

The Greek government has finally given the approval for THC-rich medical cannabis cultivation and sale.

The Minister of Development Adonis Georgiadis, who is apparently now spearheading cannabis reform in the country, even issued a “mea culpa,” admitting that he and his colleagues had been wrong about cannabis in the past.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. States with highest revenue from cannabis taxes
U.S. States with highest revenue from cannabis taxes

U.S. States with the Highest Revenue from Cannabis Taxes

The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) hasn't seen any reason to remove cannabis from its list of Schedule I banned substances. Yet, cannabis in its myriad forms is pulling in billions of dollars in vital tax revenue for those states where it is legal —$3 billion in 2022 alone.

The drug has sat in the Schedule I classification alongside heroin, peyote, and other substances the DEA considers to have a high potential for abuse since 1970, when Congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act, making it federally illegal to possess them. Two decades after the law passed, following intense social pressure that segued into the realization of a new tax opportunity, certain states began to make the drug available to residents, citing the medical benefits and relative safety compared with other substances

Keep ReadingShow less