Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

NY Lawmakers Push for Changes to Cannabis Taxation

NY Lawmakers Push for Changes to Cannabis Taxation
NY Lawmakers Push for Changes to Cannabis Taxation

Lawmakers in New York State are advocating for changes to the way cannabis is taxed in the state, in response to concerns about equity and the potential impact on consumers. Proposed changes to the taxation system could help ensure that legal cannabis is affordable and accessible for everyone, while also generating revenue for the state.

Under the current system, cannabis is taxed based on its weight, with a $1 tax per gram of flower, $0.25 per gram of trim, and $0.14 per milligram of THC in edibles. While this system is designed to generate revenue for the state, some lawmakers and advocates argue that it could disproportionately impact low-income consumers and those who rely on cannabis for medical purposes.


In response to these concerns, lawmakers have introduced a new bill, S. 4831, that would create a tiered taxation system based on the potency of the cannabis product. Under this system, there are taxes based on THC content, specifically:

- five-tenths of one cent (.005) per milligram of the amount of total THC for cannabis flower

- eight-tenths of one cent (.008) per milligram of the amount of total THC for concentrated cannabis

- three cents (.03) per milligram of the amount of total THC for cannabis edible product

The sales tax, which is currently at 9 percent, would increase to 16 percent. This 16 percent tax would occur during the sale of marijuana to a customer by a retail business. The tax would be on top of any other taxes,

The proposed legislation would also eliminate the current tax on trim and edibles, and would establish a new tax on concentrates, such as oils and waxes, which are currently not taxed under the existing system.

Advocates of the new bill argue that it would help make legal cannabis more affordable and accessible for all New Yorkers, particularly those who rely on it for medical purposes. They also argue that a tiered taxation system would promote equity by ensuring that those who can afford higher-potency products pay a larger share of the taxes.

Critics of the revised bill, however, argue that it could reduce revenue for the state, as higher-potency products tend to be more expensive and therefore generate more tax revenue under the current system. They also argue that a tiered taxation system could be difficult to implement and enforce, and could lead to confusion among consumers and retailers.

Despite these concerns, lawmakers are optimistic about the potential impact of the proposed changes. NY State Assembly Majority Leader Crystal Peoples-Stokes and NY State Sen. Jeremy Cooney, who introduced the bill, said that they believes the new system would be fairer and more equitable for all New Yorkers, while also generating revenue for the state.

Senator Cooney stated that in order to achieve the objective of establishing the most diverse and inclusive cannabis industry in the country, it is crucial to establish a conducive atmosphere that enables small enterprises and social equity operators to prosper. Swapping the potency tax for a higher excise tax will provide an opportunity for these licensed businesses to market their products at a competitive price, which would make them less vulnerable to being outpriced by the illicit market. The revenues generated can then be invested in beneficial community programs.

The bill is currently being considered by the New York State Senate, and if it is passed, it could help shape the future of cannabis taxation in the state. With the legalization of recreational cannabis set to take effect in just a few months, the stakes are high for lawmakers and advocates who are working to ensure that the new industry is equitable, accessible, and profitable for all.

More For You

Are you paying too much attention to THC percentage? - The Bluntness

Are you paying too much attention to THC percentage? - The Bluntness

High-THC: Is % Important?

If this comes as a surprise, you’re not alone. The value of a simple number on a label receives too much credit from consumers and budtenders alike. It seems no matter how many times we think we understand cannabis, science manages to throw us off - in a good way, of course.

The question of whether percentage matter is often debated, as THC percentage alone is not a reliable indicator of overall quality or experience. Like it or not, the way cannabis interacts with the mind and body makes a simple THC measurement inaccurate to tell how high you’ll get. Potency - like many things about cannabis - is complicated.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comprehensive Glossary of Cannabis Terminology - The Bluntness
Cannabis Terminology - The Bluntness
Photo by Margo Amala on Unsplash

Cannabis Glossary: 120+ Terms

Cannabis terminology can be overwhelming for new consumers. This glossary defines 120+ essential terms including cannabinoids (THC, CBD), consumption methods (vaping, edibles), and industry concepts to help you navigate dispensaries and products confidently.

Why Cannabis Terminology Matters

Cannabis terminology can feel overwhelming when you first step into a dispensary or browse online menus. Understanding the language helps you:

  • Communicate effectively with budtenders and medical professionals
  • Make informed decisions about products and consumption methods
  • Navigate dispensary menus with confidence
  • Understand product labels and lab results
  • Find products that match your needs and preferences
  • Stay safe by recognizing quality indicators and potential issues

This glossary provides clear, accurate definitions for over 120 cannabis terms, from basic concepts to advanced cultivation and processing terminology. Whether you're a first-time consumer or an experienced enthusiast, this guide will enhance your cannabis knowledge.

Keep ReadingShow less
image of California coast, pacific coast highway at sunset
How Overregulation Crushed California’s Gold Flora—And Why Other States Should Be Worried
Photo by Matthew Hamilton on Unsplash

Overregulation Kills Gold Flora

When California-based Gold Flora entered the legal cannabis scene, the company was poised to dominate. Backed by serious money and a sprawling, vertically integrated operation—from a 100,000-square-foot cultivation campus in the desert to marquee dispensaries in West Hollywood and San Jose—Gold Flora wasn't just riding the green wave. It was supposed to be the wave.

But by the end of March 2025, the company had filed for receivership, its assets now headed to auction. And while headlines cite "merger woes" and "market conditions," the real culprit behind Gold Flora’s collapse is far more systemic: a regulatory stranglehold that has quietly choked the life out of California’s once-promising cannabis economy.

Keep ReadingShow less
New York State's Cannabis License Revocation Drama Unfolds
New York State's Cannabis License Revocation Drama Unfolds
New York State's Cannabis License Revocation Drama Unfolds

New York State's Cannabis License Revocation Drama Unfolds

Since we first reported on New York State’s decision to revoke Omnium Health’s cannabis license, the situation has become even more chaotic, and more revealing.

On December 8, state regulators abruptly withdrew the enforcement charges against Omnium that had underpinned one of the Office of Cannabis Management’s most aggressive crackdowns to date. The reversal came with little public explanation and immediately triggered fallout at the highest levels of state cannabis oversight, including the removal of OCM’s executive director and the firing of the agency official who led the investigation.

Keep ReadingShow less
OCM Alleges 'Rent-a-License' Scheme, Seeks License Revocation
OCM Alleges 'Rent-a-License' Scheme, Seeks License Revocation
Photo by Jon Tyson on Unsplash

NY Revokes License in Rent-a-License Scam

Update to our coverage: Since this article was originally published, the enforcement case against Omnium Health has taken a sharp and unexpected turn. On December 8, 2025, New York’s Office of Cannabis Management abruptly withdrew the charges underpinning the license revocation, triggering leadership shakeups inside the agency and raising new questions about how the case was built and handled.

While regulators moved to step back, an administrative law judge declined to immediately dismiss the matter, leaving the door open to potential future action and lifting the recall order on roughly $30 million in Omnium products. We will continue to update this story as the situation develops.

Keep ReadingShow less